Modern warfare is all right but I hated how the multiplayer games turn into a racetrack. Battlefield always seemed to incorporate more team work that and you can blow shit up.
jtk4 wrote:Modern warfare is all right but I hated how the multiplayer games turn into a racetrack. Battlefield always seemed to incorporate more team work that and you can blow shit up.
Spot on. A bunch of my buddies that are former/current Marines will tell you the same thing. In regards to replicating actual warfare, BF series shits on MW/COD series.
Nothing beats getting in an M1-Abrams and bringing down a building, or hopping on the .50 cal.
I Like the Medal of Honor series, personally. I haven't played any of the COD games besides World at War, which was a great game. I have a thing for the WW2 games.
When you say Battlefield, you mean the "Bad Company" games, right?
Whores til proven otherwise. And they so rarely do.
for realism, try ARMA2. it craps all over the battlefield series in realism. it just takes forever to get proficient at it. RO2:HOS has been compared with BF3 for realism, but is set on the eastern front of WWII.
self banned from the politics thread since 11/16/2009
You mean when a real person get hits in the head with a .50 cal he will not be able to be brought back to life by a defibrillator? There is a fine line between realism and playability. MW is more arcade like I do not mind it but it gets old just running around like that.