New Study Says Men Are Attracted To Dumb, Easy Chicks

Slate – Ask a straight man, “How do you like your women?” and it’s unlikely he’ll answer, “Dumb and sleepy.” But according to new findings, these characteristics—and any other traits suggesting that the lady isn’t particularly alert—are precisely what the human male has evolved to look for in a one-night-stand. In an article soon to be published in Evolution and Human Behavior, University of Texas–Austin graduate student Cari Goetz and her colleagues explored what they called the sexual exploitability hypothesis. The hypothesis is based on the differences between male and female reproductive strategies as humans evolved. They set out to test the idea that any indication that a woman’s guard is lowered—that she’s “sexually exploitable”—is a turn-on for your average man. “[T]he assessment of a woman’s immediate vulnerability,” surmise the authors, “may be central to the activation of psychological mechanisms related to sexual exploitation.” To figure out which sorts of women might be deemed most receptive to a sexual advance or most vulnerable to male pressure or coercion, they asked a large group of students (103 men and 91 women) to nominate some “specific actions, cues, body postures, attitudes, and personality characteristics” that might indicate receptivity or vulnerability. Here’s a sampling of what they came up with: “lip lick/bite,” “over-shoulder look,” “sleepy,” “intoxicated,” “tight clothing,” “fat,” “short,” “unintelligent,” “punk,” “attention-seeking,” and “touching breast.”
Let me ask you a question – when you’re playing the Oregon Trail and you’re in a grueling battle to make it to Independence Rock and you stop to hunt, what are you aiming for? Are you trying to shoot the quick, elusive, unfulfilling rabbits running back and forth all over the fucking place? Or are you aiming for the dumb, slow, satisfying buffalo? Its a no brainer. You’re starving. You have dysentery. You have needs to fulfill and you’re trying to survive. You’re going for the sure thing.
Hunting on the Oregon Trail is no different than trying to fuck chicks. Sure, some times you wanna prove to yourself you can nail a rabbit. Prove that you’ve got the skill as a hunter to take down the most elusive prey. But what happens most often? You end up wasting your bullets and wasting your effort and you end up with no dinner. On the other hand you’ve got the buffalo. Sure, lugging back a maximum 200 pound buffalo back to your wagon isn’t your proudest moment as a hunter. But you’re going to bed satisfied that night.
PS – The fact that there was a panel of 100 men and the most attractive qualities they came up with is fat, short, unintelligent, BREAST TOUCHING and SLEEPY is downright hilarious. Imagine being at the bar and being like “Oh yea, see that one? No no, not the cute one. The sleepy one rubbing her tits behind her…DIBS!
PPS – Absolutely A+ 10 out of 10 analogy from me regarding the Oregon Trail. I’m so good at my job its scary.

This is why the country is loaded with student loan debt, completely useless study. Could have made the same conclusion by following me around for a month.
Except for the fact that buffalo tastes better than rabbit, you’re spot on.
Solid analogy for sure.
I agree 100%. Fuck people who say, “a girl with confidence is sexy”. Give me a submissive broad everyday of the week.
I can only imaging how fucking satisfied you must have felt after you came up with that analogy. You prob started typing it and just realized as you kept going that it was spot-fucking-on. Bravo sir.
Well played kfc, well played
Laughed out loud at the first PS
Someone tell KOBarstool that Rape Culture is science.
Great blog….also the reason the divorce rate is high….i married a woman every bit my intellectual equal (who is now an M.D.) 10 years ago and we are happy as can be….my buddies who mostly married illiterate boob jobs are all divorced
the analogy is all fucking off. it buffalo were as quick and tough to hit as rabbits then it would work. But this retard shit “Sure, lugging back a maximum 200 pound buffalo back to your wagon isn’t your proudest moment as a hunter” what the fuck? do you understand how dumb that is. the hunter would be hanging his head if all he came back with was a rabbit. its just that you thought that its easier to hit a buffalo then rabbit, so you tried to force an analogy that is just fucking backwards.
Is it me or could only a woman think this topic is actually worth researching? Isn’t this just so blatantly obvious to every guy out there?
I’ve never seen a person having no idea what the fuck they’re talking about throw in such a mind numbingly dumb statement in the comment section like this. We’re talking about Oregon Trail here, not practice not real hunting
fucking gold, the first PS was Newberry(think thats some writing award?) worthy.
Yea bakess and In Oregon Trail it is better for your wagon to have a shitload of Buffalo meat, its something to be proud of to support the wagonmates with plentiful meats
hafta agree, A+ analogy.
Oh I feel this. Only difference is that the only times I’ve ever fucked fat chicks, I’ve felt a horrific shame the next morning that made we want to never do it again. Now, fat chicks are only acceptable if the times are truly desperate. We’re talking 6 months drought or more. Otherwise, it’s just shameful savage behavior.
I was going to compliment u on the awesome reference until u applauded yourself….asshole
A+ blog, who said they are attracted to “fat” chicks?
nice clancy
we can’t cure cancer, but thank god we finally cleared up that men are down to fuck easy chicks